Part 1:
I find the results of this test to be relatively useless on their own. Granted, it's a nice insight into ones being, but without a written analysis of one self or more in depth response, the results just kind of sit there, momentarily making you think before you forget them to go check your facebook.
That being said, after reviewing a more thorough analysis of what these traits say about ourselves in class, I think that a level of self analysis can be accomplished in which one looks inward and understands their actions better. However, since this is based on our answers about what we think , the legitimacy of the answers can be questioned, but then we can also learn to see ourselves more accurately if compared with a test that reveals or actual actions and thoughts on these courses of events.
Part 2:
The test seems to be pretty reliable in most cases. While some people in class did disagree with their results, most people in the class would then agree with the results, showing that they are in fact quite valid. With my own results, upon reviewing what they said about me in detail, I would agree that this test is mostly accurate. The thing is, it is largely debatable because people might say that they would act one way and then act another. Also, a person might not find their results reliable because they don't like to look at themselves that way. These are simple problems that may arise very easily, however through these problems may also arise a better understanding of ones actual place in the world and how one acts. Overall, it is like a significantly more accurate horoscope, it could turn out to be total baloney but at the same time it can actually be relevant and lead to a certain path.
No comments:
Post a Comment